类 SyntaxSuggest::LeftRightLexCount

Find 基于词法计数的语法不匹配

用于检测缺少的元素对，每个关键字都需要一个 end，每个 ‘{’ 需要一个 ‘}’ 等等。

示例

left_right = LeftRightLexCount.new
left_right.count_kw
left_right.missing.first
# => "end"

left_right = LeftRightLexCount.new
source = "{ a: b, c: d" # Note missing '}'
LexAll.new(source: source).each do |lex|
  left_right.count_lex(lex)
end
left_right.missing.first
# => "}"

常量

PAIRS

公共类方法

new() 点击切换源代码

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 25
def initialize
  @kw_count = 0
  @end_count = 0

  @count_for_char = {
    "{" => 0,
    "}" => 0,
    "[" => 0,
    "]" => 0,
    "(" => 0,
    ")" => 0,
    "|" => 0
  }
end

公共实例方法

count_end() 点击切换源代码

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 44
def count_end
  @end_count += 1
end

count_for_char(char) 点击切换源代码

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 101
def count_for_char(char)
  @count_for_char[char]
end

count_kw() 点击切换源代码

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 40
def count_kw
  @kw_count += 1
end

count_lex(lex) 点击切换源代码

统计源代码字符

示例

left_right = LeftRightLexCount.new
left_right.count_lex(LexValue.new(1, :on_lbrace, "{", Ripper::EXPR_BEG))
left_right.count_for_char("{")
# => 1
left_right.count_for_char("}")
# => 0

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 58
def count_lex(lex)
  case lex.type
  when :on_tstring_content
    # ^^^
    # Means it's a string or a symbol `"{"` rather than being
    # part of a data structure (like a hash) `{ a: b }`
    # ignore it.
  when :on_words_beg, :on_symbos_beg, :on_qwords_beg,
       :on_qsymbols_beg, :on_regexp_beg, :on_tstring_beg
    # ^^^
    # Handle shorthand syntaxes like `%Q{ i am a string }`
    #
    # The start token will be the full thing `%Q{` but we
    # need to count it as if it's a `{`. Any token
    # can be used
    char = lex.token[-1]
    @count_for_char[char] += 1 if @count_for_char.key?(char)
  when :on_embexpr_beg
    # ^^^
    # Embedded string expressions like `"#{foo} <-embed"`
    # are parsed with chars:
    #
    # `#{` as :on_embexpr_beg
    #  `}` as :on_embexpr_end
    #
    # We cannot ignore both :on_emb_expr_beg and :on_embexpr_end
    # because sometimes the lexer thinks something is an embed
    # string end, when it is not like `lol = }` (no clue why).
    #
    # When we see `#{` count it as a `{` or we will
    # have a mis-match count.
    #
    case lex.token
    when "\#{"
      @count_for_char["{"] += 1
    end
  else
    @end_count += 1 if lex.is_end?
    @kw_count += 1 if lex.is_kw?
    @count_for_char[lex.token] += 1 if @count_for_char.key?(lex.token)
  end
end

missing() 点击切换源代码

返回一个包含缺少的语法字符或 ‘“end”` 或 `“keyword”` 的数组

left_right.missing
# => ["}"]

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 110
def missing
  out = missing_pairs
  out << missing_pipe
  out << missing_keyword_end
  out.compact!
  out
end

私有实例方法

missing_keyword_end() 点击切换源代码

关键字需要 ends，ends 需要关键字

如果我们有更多关键字，则缺少一个 ‘end`；如果我们有更多 `end`-s，则缺少一个关键字

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 148
        def missing_keyword_end
  case @kw_count <=> @end_count
  when 1
    "end"
  when 0
    nil
  when -1
    "keyword"
  end
end

missing_pairs() 点击切换源代码

像 ‘{` 这样的开始字符需要像 `}` 这样的结束字符。

当检测到不匹配计数时，建议缺少的成员。

例如，如果有 3 个 ‘}` 和只有两个 `{`，则返回 `“{”`

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 131
        def missing_pairs
  PAIRS.map do |(left, right)|
    case @count_for_char[left] <=> @count_for_char[right]
    when 1
      right
    when 0
      nil
    when -1
      left
    end
  end
end

missing_pipe() 点击切换源代码

管道成对出现。如果管道数量为奇数，则缺少一个

# File lib/syntax_suggest/left_right_lex_count.rb, line 162
        def missing_pipe
  if @count_for_char["|"].odd?
    "|"
  end
end